Good—simple choices for a better life

Article illustration

An even more inconvenient truth

Home » Blog » Miyuki McGuffie » An even more inconvenient truth

Meat consumption is murder but not just for animals, it kills the planet too. Blogger Miyuki McGuffie explores the environmental impacts of the average diet.

Image by Szymon Stoma via Flickr

Did you know that what you eat may have as big an impact on the environment as how often you drive your car?

Government agencies and the media choose to focus on reducing our carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by increasing our renewable energy sources, using eco-bulbs and reducing our dependence on fossil fuels. Meanwhile, our potential to fight global warming from all angles is unrealised due to a lack of information about the other badies: methane and nitrous oxide.

Methane emissions are responsible for about half of the planet’s human-attributed warming and animal agriculture produces 32 percent of this. Other sources include landfills, natural gas and coal mining. Methane takes less time to break down in the atmosphere than carbon but is over 20 times more potent.

Nitrous oxide is almost 300 times more damaging to the environment than carbon and is made when we burn fossil fuels and manufacture nylon. From the total amount of nitrous oxide produced by human activity, 65 percent comes from livestock.

Meat production accounts for more greenhouse gas emissions than all methods of transport in the world combined. These gases come from animal excrement, enteric fermentation, the manufacture of fertiliser to grow feed, industrial feed production, and transportation of live and slaughtered animals.

Why are these facts so relatively unknown?

Why isn’t a reduction in meat consumption being encouraged alongside energy efficiency promotions and pleas to use less petrol?

My personal opinion is that while oil is running out, there is no shortage of animals to be consumed (because we control the supply through breeding). Eating meat is ingrained in our culture (it goes back much further than driving) and is seen as an instinctual, natural part of being a human. Cars don’t need petrol to run, but there is no real alternative to animal flesh that gives the same sensual experience.

Because of these reasons, there is still plenty of money to be made from meat. I also believe that despite it being in our best interests, the government would never implement a strategy to promote a considerable reduction in the public’s consumption of meat because the industry would give them a bollocking.

Cutting meat out of your diet even just some days a week can make a big difference to the environment. Forgive the British examples but consider the following comparisons:

  • If everyone in the UK gave up meat for one day a week, the savings in emissions would be equal to replacing one billion light bulbs with energy-efficient ones.
  • If everyone in the UK gave up meat for six days a week, the amount of greenhouse gasses saved would be greater than removing ALL cars from UK roads (29 million).

On a more immediate level, reducing your consumption of meat can benefit your health, save the lives of animals and, most important for some, save you money.

In the days before I was aware of the environment and food ethics, I stopped buying meat as a staple purely to save money. Sure, you have to make up that bulk in other areas (preferably produce), and for some reason fruit and veg seem to have a reputation for being expensive but when was the last time you saw broccoli, carrots or potatoes for more than $10 a kilo?

Any environmentalist who’s serious about saving the planet needs to consider their diet just as carefully, if not more than their other habits when thinking about the impact of their day-to-day actions. I’m not saying that we should all become vegans, because I know it’s hard to give up animal products and I know there are lots of reason why a person wouldn’t (other than not caring). It’s an extremely complex issue but from an environmental perspective, industrialised meat production is not sustainable, and awareness of this needs to be raised.

Comments

Andrew Hedges
itsthelittlethings.info
 
Thu October 22, 2009 @ 10:10 AM
I've written about this topic as well and one of the stats I think drives the point home for meatatarians is this: It takes 3kg of plant protein to produce 1kg of animal protein. Everyone can agree that's a waste of resources.
Benn Crawford
benncrawford.wordpress.com
 
Fri October 30, 2009 @ 04:11 PM
Is the issue specifically industrialised meat production?If so, there is obviously the alternative choice of non-industrialised meat production which I assume is less damaging to the environment. If this is the case, perhaps Good could report on how NZer's can buy meat products with less impact on the environment (and identify people/players in the industry who are taking a more ethically approach). I'm always more partial to the "speak to what you are for, not what you are against" approach. You might win more  over hardened meat lovers that way.

 If eating some meat ins't a 'bad' thing then maybe we could start more discussion around what the better ways are???
Annabel McAleer
 
Fri October 30, 2009 @ 04:47 PM
Hi Benn,

I agree with you that it's better to focus on the positive, and that's what we're trying to do. We did a report on 'biological' farmers last year that you might want to check out. We've also compared the carbon emissions of different animals farmed for food (scroll about halfway down; it's in the left-hand column!).

Lots of people won't ever be convinced to go vegetarian, so my personal view is that being more conscious of where your meat comes from and  decreasing how much of it you eat is a pretty admirable goal. Just eating less beef is enough to make a really big difference to your carbon footprint. As you can see from the table in that link above, pork and lamb are a better choice than beef, and eating chicken doesn't do much harm at all in terms of climate change -- it could even be beneficial if you keep chickens yourself and feel them your leftovers!

As for industrialised vs non-industrialised farming, what's better depends on your definition of environmental harm. My understanding is that keeping cows in sheds (like US industrial farms do) actually stops their waste getting into streams etc, and decreases their nitrogen contribution to greenhouse gases 'cos their wees doesn't go into the soil. But it means they're fed grain, which is way less sustainable than letting them eat grass, and it's unhealthy for the humans that eat their meat (corn feed is hard for cows to digest and can lead to e-coli). It's also not much fun for the cows, but that's an ethical issue not an environmental one.

It's a huge issue (and one that can get pretty emotional and controversial) but it's great to keep the conversations going!
Miyuki
www.ecoamico.wordpress.com
 
Sat October 31, 2009 @ 12:32 AM
One problem with industrialised farming is that there are way too many animals on a piece of land that is too small to be able to deal with their waste. Instances where animals are farmed indoors aren't necessarily better because the farmers then have to dispose of the waste properly, which isn't always what's done.

As for better ways of eating meat, yes, free range/organic is always "better" but not optimal. As far as environmental impact goes it's more to do with the volume of meat we eat, not how it's produced. So if you want a "better" way to keep consuming meat I would suggest cutting back, big time (like, a majority of your week), and also cut back on animal products altogether, eggs and dairy, because those industries are about as bad as meat. But bear in mind that while this is a "better" way it's not necessarily the "best". It just depends on how far an individual is willing to go.

We need a major societal shift in thinking for measurable changes to be made in this area. The sad thing is that we don't really hear all that much about it compared to other ways to reduce emissions. A shame really, considering how big an impact it could have.

Add your comment

Anonymous comments are queued before publishing and it may take some time before they appear. Please consider creating an account and your comment will appear automatically. If you already have an account, please log in.








If you have trouble reading the code, click on the code itself to generate a new random code
 

More Goodness

The Good blog
  • Winter pick-me-ups
    article illustration

    As gloomy weather sets in, it's the little things that lift your mood. Like these candy-coloured retro leather purses from Green With Envy – a splash of gorgeousness on the daily shop. And we've got two to give away!

  • How to get rid of oxalis?
    article illustration

    Good's new gardening expert Zoe Carafice is ready and waiting to solve your dilemmas! Each question published on Zoe's blog or in Good receives a fab prize from Tui Garden. This week: how to eradicate oxalis bulbs.

  • One good reason to skip lunch
    article illustration

    Plenty of food that’s good enough to eat (but not good enough to sell) is disposed of every day. Kaibosh Food Rescue is aiming to change all that by collecting extra food and distributing it to charities. Now they're calling on Kiwis to donate the cost of a meal on Miss a Meal in May Day – so they can expand their mission to help out the hungry.

Good magazine
  • Urban harvest
    article illustration

    Could you live off the land? Nancy Howie travels to Canada to discover how one grassroots movement is redefining the suburban dream.

  • Where has fracking been allowed on the East Coast?
    article illustration

    Armed with exploration licenses issued by the New Zealand government, Tag Oil and its partner Apache intend to extract oil and gas from the East Coast. See the map here >

  • Man-made earthquakes
    article illustration

    Is it possible for human activity to cause quakes? One investigation in Blackpool, England discovered that more than fifty tremors in the region were caused by fracking operations. Read the article >

article illustration

Latest issue

Discover what gives your home soul, tips for easy entertaining and making favourite clothes last longer. Find latest research on honey for health and the brainiest breakfasts, plus guides to greenwashing, distilling and the best loo paper to buy.

Follow us

Latest comments

  • B on Winter pick-me-ups:
    I often despise coming home after work to have to stand in the kitchen for ages cooking.  So I try to make huge pots or add extra vege'  
  • Erin on Winter pick-me-ups:
    For me, I make sure I know where my fuzzy tramping socks are - super for wearing in my beautiful work boots, and in my gumboots while I mow  
  • Hilary on Winter pick-me-ups:
    winterproof your home by reducing humidity inside (when it's damp it feels colder). It is amazing what a difference it makes to slick/squeeg  
  • leah c on Winter pick-me-ups:
    Soups, and lots of it.  Everyone likes it, it's warm hearty food and a great way of using up old veggies and some of the winter crops i  
  • Linda on Winter pick-me-ups:
    I make sure I have a bottle of one of the blackcurrant type syrups, I find it hard to keep up the water intake when the temps drop, so add h  
  • Cassidy on Your eco kitchen makeover:
    Although I love the idea of the glass jars for baking ingredients etc. would Tupperware be alright as it lasts a lifetime?
  • Karen on Winter pick-me-ups:
    I've just finished knitting a sweater for a hot water bottle cover, so it stays hot longer and also doesn't get to hot when hugging it. Trou  
  • Gaye on Winter pick-me-ups:
    Nothing beats coming home to  a spicy beef curry and a steamed jam sponge pudding smothered with custard after a brisk walk embracing t  

Blogs

Good pages

Good Shopping Handbook