good 

New Zealand’s guide to sustainable living

Subscribe

  • Only $45!
  • 20% goes to the Asthma Foundation of New Zealand
Article illustration

Home sick home

Home » Magazine » Good, issue 6 » Home sick home

Cold, damp and filled with toxins—we sure know how to build ’em. Many of our houses seem better suited to growing toxic moulds than raising healthy children. Attack the problem with the typical arsenal of household cleaners and you’re likely to add to the unhealthy conditions. Are our homes making us sick? Sarah Heeringa investigates

Heather Thompson was pregnant with her second child when she, her husband and their six-month-old moved into a 90-year-old bungalow in Invercargill. “The house seemed okay at the time,” recalls Heather, “but in hindsight I realise it was fundamentally damp.”

The Thompson’s house was a flood house—so-named after a flood of biblical proportions swamped the region in 1984, forcing the evacuation of 1,400 homes. What later became the Thompson’s family home stood in water up to the top of its windows.

The house dried out, but no insulation was added. “When we moved in there was no insulation apart from some old batts in the ceiling—and no space to get under the house,” says Heather. Swollen wooden joinery was replaced with aluminium, ironically only compounding the house’s problems; aluminium joinery is a poor insulator, as heat is lost through the frames.

Living in a damp house took its toll. Heather’s daughter developed chronic bronchitis, and at ten months her son was diagnosed with asthma. “He was a nocturnal asthmatic, so many hours were spent with him during the night as he coughed and cried and was unable to breathe,” she says. “He suffered chronic coughs and colds, and lost a lot of time from kindy and later school. We both took a lot of sick days.”

Three-and-a-half years ago the family moved to an elevated home with insulation in both the floor and ceiling, a woodburner and double-glazed windows. At the time Heather’s son was on daily medication but since the move his asthma has completely cleared up. He hasn’t needed any medication since.

Heather and her family are among the lucky ones. In her job with the Southland branch of the Asthma and Respiratory Foundation, Heather sees the same cycle of cold, damp houses and sick children repeated too many times for comfort. But the problem of New Zealand’s sick homes is not confined to old flood houses, or Invercargill. The shameful fact is that many of our homes don’t need a flood to make them damp—they’re damp by design.

And it’s making us sick. In a 2008 ShapeNZ housing survey, more than one     in four New Zealanders said the home they lived in had contributed to their sickness. The root cause? No less than a million of our 1.6 million homes are cold, damp and difficult to heat. 

The New Zealand Business Council for Sustainable Development (NZBCSD) recently commissioned a far-reaching study of the issue, and their 2008 report on the topic makes grim reading. Nearly two-thirds of New Zealand’s homes were built before insulation became a legal requirement in 1979. Though most of our houses have some insulation, it’s often been in place for years and is no longer very effective. About 375,000 New Zealand homes have inadequate ceiling insulation and over one million have inadequate underfloor insulation. Most homes lack double-glazing and insulation in the walls, and many are oriented the wrong way—typically facing the road rather than the sun.

Something’s rotten

We’ve all heard about leaky homes—even if we’ve been fortunate enough not to live in one. From the 1990s on, countless houses were either poorly designed or had building products that were inappropriately installed. The sorry outcome: a swag of houses that simply don’t stand up to New Zealand’s weather conditions, are damp and chronically mouldy. But the problem of mould is not just confined to leaky homes. Nearly half our houses are mouldy, says the NZBCSD.

Mould and mildew are more than a big headache. Some moulds, such as the Stachybotrys fungi, are highly toxic. But inhaling large numbers of spores from less noxious varieties can also have serious health implications. Respiratory problems (wheezing and shortness of breath, flu-like symptoms, nasal and sinus congestion, eye, nose and throat irritations, a dry, hacking cough), skin rashes and even depression are all linked to living in damp, mouldy homes. Such conditions particularly affect babies, old people and those with weakened immune systems. Mould and mildew also exacerbate illnesses such as asthma or bronchitis.

Mould can be a problem in homes of all ages. Not all modern houses leak but, ironically, watertight homes are often relatively airtight too, and unless they’ve been designed to allow for passive ventilation they are also candidates for mould. Older houses have more ventilation (most are just plain drafty), but the air coming in around windows and up through the floorboards can be cold and damp. Add steamy showers, cooking vapour, unvented dryers and unflued gas heaters, and you’re soon pumping in more moisture than can easily escape. In houses with no insulation, the walls and ceilings act like water sponges, attracting moisture from the air, says Albrecht Stoecklein of Right House, a Meridian Energy-owned company dedicated to raising the quality of New Zealand’s houses. And once moist air condenses, it leads to mould.

Trying to eliminate mould in such conditions can be like trying to hold back the tide. One of Heather’s clients lives in a 40-year-old state house that is both damp and plagued with severe black mould. The two youngest boys in the family have chronic respiratory problems, often to the point of being hospitalised. “Their mother is constantly cleaning to try to get rid of the mould, but when I visited her last Christmas I could see it was continuing to grow, even in summer,” says Heather.

It’s a vicious cycle. Clean your house with bleach, chlorine and other household cleaning heavies, and you’re likely to add more poisonous elements to an already unhealthy mix. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are found in common household cleaners as well as in some paints and paint thinners, plastic shower curtains, carpet backing, plastics, cosmetics and even personal hygiene products. Formaldehyde, a common VOC, is found in laminated furniture, particle board, foam insulations, shelving and even wall covers. According to the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), many homes have two to five times more air pollutants than the air outside.

VOCs are major contributors to the poor air quality inside our homes and have been linked to respiratory illness. A recent study from Curtin University in Western Australia showed that VOC levels were significantly higher in the homes of children with asthma, and that children who’d been exposed to fumes from common household cleaning products were up to four times more likely to develop asthma than those who were not.

In the past, women used natural cleaners and they’d routinely air homes by opening windows and letting fresh breezes blow through. “Times have changed,” says Mike Perrett, director of heat recovery ventilation company HRV. “For one thing, when most of our city’s houses were built there weren’t 40,000 cars driving through the neighbourhood each day.”

HRV consultants make 7,000 national in-home assessments per month. “In talking to the country’s homeowners it’s become clear that many people are now shutting up their houses and going off to work all day,” says Mike. And when we are home, concerns about security, privacy and air pollution deter us from leaving doors or windows open for any length of time. “Add damp conditions and lack of ventilation to the changing ways we are living, and what you can get is air loaded with dust and dust mite waste, particles of human skin and hair, pollens, chemicals, adhesives and smoke.”

Cold comfort

As well as being prone to mould, damp houses feel cold and are hard to heat. Without proper insulation the task’s even harder. The average New Zealand house is “scarily cold,” says Victoria University professor Robert Vale. “It’s badly insulated, has huge expanses of single-glazed glass, and is a nightmare to heat.” In terms of energy-efficient homes it’s “pretty much where the Scandinavians were in the 1960s.”

The comparison with Scandinavia reminds me of a Danish friend who complained that he’d never been as cold as when he spent a winter in Auckland—    a tad embarrassing considering that the temperature hovers around zero on a typical winter’s day in Copenhagen.

But it’s hardly ever that cold here, right? Can’t we just put on a jumper in winter?

“New Zealand housing says as much about our world-famous ingenuity as it does about our tough pioneering spirit,” observed writer Andy Kenworthy recently in Idealog magazine. “Things like insulation, draft-proofing and efficient heating systems have traditionally been frivolous luxuries—strictly for those lacking the singlet, shorts and gumboot-wearing grit to make it through our South Pacific winters.”

“Insulation levels in New Zealand’s existing housing stock often compare to third world standards,” says Albrecht. The sorry fact is, though we might live in houses built for the tropics (‘bungalow’ was first an Indian concept, and villas—with their high ceilings, sash windows and wide verandahs—were surely designed with gin and tonics rather than bitter southerlies in mind) our climate is subtropical at best, and indoor temperatures frequently dip to unhealthy levels. The World Health Organisation recommends a minimum temperature for living areas of 18°C or 21°C for babies, children or elderly people. Sixteen degrees can strain the respiratory system and heart—but according to a 2008 study by the Centre for Research Evaluation and Social Assessment (CRESA), more than one-fifth of Kiwi living rooms are colder than 16°C on a typical winter’s evening.

Heating an uninsulated home is expensive. Houses are the world’s largest consumers of energy and the average New Zealand household uses over one-third of its total energy trying to keep warm. According to the Department of Building and Housing, that equates to approximately $1,800 a year ($150 a month) spent on electricity and gas heating in the typical home.

Our heating choices are often quite ad hoc. High-output devices may be cheap to buy, but are often very expensive to run. Seventy-two percent of Kiwi homes use portable electric heaters, which are convenient but inefficient. Even worse, one-third of New Zealand households use unflued gas heaters. These fill unventilated rooms with dangerous levels of nitrogen dioxide, formaldehyde and carbon monoxide, and pump litres and litres of water vapour into the air. This only makes a damp house damper and further exacerbates asthma. “It’s why such heaters have been banned elsewhere in the world,” says Wellington Medical School professor Philippa Howden-Chapman.

Joining the dots

One in six adults and one in four children suffer from asthma in New Zealand, and associated hospitalisation rates have more than doubled over the past 30 years. Air that is cold, or polluted with dust mites, moulds or fumes triggers asthma. It’s not rocket science to make the link between our cold houses, their poor air quality, and our nation’s high asthma rate—the second highest in the world just behind the UK. Nor does it take a genius to see that, in addition to our appalling asthma rate, the myriad other health problems caused by living in cold, damp houses are making us poorer, sicker and less able to function effectively.

Every day 780 people don’t turn up for work and 50 people are hospitalised because they live in damp, cold homes, says the NZBCSD. This equates to at least $17 million a year in lost production. Then there are the countless hours lost by kids too sick to attend school or simply too tired to concentrate after a night’s coughing.

“The present poor energy efficiency of our houses in New Zealand has had serious public health consequences,” says Philippa. When the temperature drops in winter in New Zealand, there are approximately 1,600 more deaths than in summer. It’s no exaggeration to say our homes are killing us.

Want more?

Check out these websites when building or re-fitting
your home:
www.energyadvice.org.nz               www.hybridhomes.co.nz
www.ecodesignadvisor.org.nz       www.rinnai.co.nz
www.consumerbuild.org.nz           www.dbh.govt.nz
www.warrenandmahoney.com      www.ebode.co.nz
www.lockwood.co.nz                        www.absa.net.nz

Sources
  • Better Performing Homes for New Zealanders: Making it happen (The New Zealand Business Council for Sustainable Development, 2008) 
  • Living Green: The New Zealand Handbook for an Eco-friendly, toxin free, sustainable life, by Annmaree Kane and Christina Neubert (New Holland Publishers, 2008)
  • Housing, Heating and Health Study: Heater Analysis (University of Otago Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, September 2005)
  • www.righthouse.co.nz
  • www.energywise.govt.nz
  • www.smarterhomes.org.nz

Comments

Virginia
 
Thu May 13, 2010 @ 04:51 PM
How can you convince your landlord to put in more insulation? We rent at the moment. I consider myself to know quite a bit about ecodesign in architecture but still have the problem of a warm dry house. Our current rental may have a little bit of insulation in the ceiling. Haven't checked it out but definitely none in the walls and under the floor. Our only source of heating is a heat pump which does quite well because it is a small house - though we do have an oil heater in our daughters room when we need to close the door. We consider that we have a pretty good landlord and we are doing all we can to keep the house warm and insulated, ie thermal curtains. But to get a landlord to put in insulation is nigh on impossible.
Lindis
 
Thu May 13, 2010 @ 05:38 PM
I also rent so I know how unwilling landlords can be to spend money!

More & more tenants are looking ofr warm, dry homes rather than just any old place. If your landlord insulates, they will be likely to get a better class of tenant in the future. Find articles/research papers showing this demand & copy them for your landlord.

I know I've read articles about this recently and will post back here if I can find links to them!
Millie Pickle
 
Fri May 14, 2010 @ 07:34 AM
It surprises me that Kiwis have been willing to accept such substandard quality, especially while paying inflated prices for housing ownership as well as rental. The lowest standards are in places which began as holiday locations, such as Waiheke Island, where I live. One would think that when people began to stay in houses year round that some change would have occurred but the movement toward decent, warm, dry, affordable housing has yet to really kick in. I have worked in settlement building projects in Mexico and the housing here is on a par with what I saw there, albeit with fancy black siding. There does not seem to be a feeling that we deserve better, it's like we should be happy with whatever we get...I wonder why?
Annabel McAleer
 
Fri May 14, 2010 @ 08:53 AM
Virginia, you could try contacting EECA. I just read this:

"EECA has conducted research that has shown 88 per cent of renters
are likely to stay longer in more energy-efficient properties and 83
per cent of renters are more likely to rent homes that are
energy-efficient in the first place - so there is definitely something
in it for landlords too!" (From this website -- with loads more good advice. Lindis was that your question they're answering?!)

This NZPA story is also interesting.

Add your comment

Anonymous comments are queued before publishing and it may take some time before they appear. Please consider creating an account and your comment will appear automatically. If you already have an account, please log in.








If you have trouble reading the code, click on the code itself to generate a new random code
 

More Goodness

The Good blog
  • Girl Guides embark on breast cancer awareness campaign, and world record attempt
    article illustration

    The Dargaville Girl Guides are trying to break the world record for the longest chain of bras, and in doing so raise awareness of breast cancer. To top it off, all the high quality bras will be sent overseas to women in Africa, the Pacific Islands, and Haiti.

  • Visiting Grey Lynn farmers market could win you $5,000
    article illustration

    We might have trouble with sheds, but the slow food movement is alive and well in Central Auckland. This weekend's Grey Lynn farmers market has food, live music and bicycle repair—and the chance to win $5,000.

  • Floating wetlands to combat algal scum
    article illustration

    A Bay of Plenty Regional Council and Te Arawa Lakes Trust initiative is working with schools and the community to construct floating wetlands on Rotorua lakes. They hope to provide new habitat for fish and birds, and hopefully remove some harmful nutrients from the lakes' waters.

Good magazine
  • Bring home the bacon
    article illustration

    Five months pregnant and facing her 40th birthday, Francesca Price decides it’s time to go pig hunting

  • Aspartame

    Should you worry about aspartame?

  • How to hypermile
    article illustration

    Fuel-efficient driving is easy. Here are ten tips (in no particular order) that can massively reduce your fuel bill

article illustration

Latest issue

Get smart! The winter issue of Good takes a look at the trends and tech that'll change our lives for the better over the next few years. Plus: Seal those draughty gaps at home, stay healthy and happy at work, and throw kids' parties without breaking the bank—or the bin!

Follow us

Latest comments

Blogs

Intrepid Travel National Volunteer Awards
Good Shopping Handbook
Sign On - The World Needs Us
carboNZero logo

Good magazine is a carboNZero certified product